Bride-to-Be Doesn’t Want to Invite Partners of Fiancé’s Family Members to Their Wedding for This Particular Reason

Trending 1 week ago

"Two wrongs don't make a right," 1 personification told nan bride arsenic she sought advice

Published connected August 24, 2025 04:00PM EDT

A bride and groom successful a heated chat (stock image). Credit :

Jupiterimages/Getty

NEED TO KNOW

  • A Mumsnet personification explained that nan impermanent database for her and her fiancé’s wedding mightiness not see his cousins’ partners
  • “Am I being bitter to opportunity to my fiancé that, yes, he should induce his cousins, but we shouldn’t beryllium inviting nan partners past either, considering I wasn’t invited to theirs?” nan female asked
  • The bride-to-be past solicited opinions from Mumsnet users

A bride-to-be is contemplating nan impermanent database for her wedding.

The female explained connected nan organization forum Mumsnet that respective unfavorable wedding-related experiences pinch her fiancé’s family mightiness power whom they induce to observe their nuptials adjacent year.

“I’ve been pinch my fiancé for 3 years,” she wrote. “There person been 2 weddings successful his family wherever I person not been invited but my fiancé has.”

A groom and a bride connected their wedding time (stock image).

Chev Wilkinson/Getty

She past wondered successful nan forum, “Am I being bitter to opportunity to my fiancé that, yes, he should induce his cousins, but we shouldn’t beryllium inviting nan partners past either, considering I wasn’t invited to theirs?”

Never miss a communicative — motion up for PEOPLE's free regular newsletter to enactment up-to-date connected nan champion of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from personage news to compelling quality liking stories.

Providing much discourse astir nan size of their upcoming wedding, nan female said that theirs will beryllium “quite a mini wedding” with astir 50 to 60 group attending arsenic they “want to effort and support costs down.”

She added, “My fiancé thinks we should beryllium nan bigger group and conscionable induce their partners arsenic they are married, moreover though he has only met their partners astatine nan weddings, which I wasn’t invited to arsenic his partner.”

In a canvass nether her Aug. 18 post, 81% of nan astir 600 voters selected nan “You are NOT being unreasonable” voting option.

“Absolutely don’t induce partners,” one scholar replied, past explaining, “They group nan barroom and arsenic you want to support numbers down past that’s fair. It’s thing to do pinch being a bigger person. It’s astir your wedding and what you want. You don’t moreover person to induce nan cousins.”

Another Mumsnet personification disagreed pinch that sentiment.

“They were incorrect not to induce you, but 2 wrongs don't make a right, and I work together pinch your fiancé. He sounds nice,” that personification commented. “Right aliases wrong, now that these partners are joined to cousins, they are family. And sloppy of nan past, it would beryllium incorrect not to induce them.”