Dad stumped by 10-year-old son’s math homework: ‘Must be missing something’

A confused dada has been near stumped by his 10-year-old son’s mathematics homework, truthful he’s turned to nan net for help.

The American begetter took to Reddit aft being near puzzled by a multiple-choice mobility fixed to his superior school-aged child.

While location are 4 different “answers” to take from, nan concerned dada noted location “must beryllium missing something” from nan equation, arsenic nary of nan options appeared to beryllium correct.

“This peculiar mobility was successful my son’s mathematics homework from nan different day,” he wrote.

“They reviewed nan answers successful people today, and apparently nan reply was A.”

The mobility that has him, and everyone else, scratching their heads was this: Kayla has 18 bottles of bubbles. She wants to springiness 2 bottles to each of her six friends. How galore bottles will she person near over?

Kids past had nan action of 4 expressions and were challenged to place nan 1 that “solves nan problem.”

It read: A) (18 disagreement 2) disagreement 6, B) (18 disagreement 2) + 6, C) (18 x 2) – 6, aliases D) (18 x 2) + 6.

But arsenic nan dad, who said he was “curious really they came to this answer” – pointed out, “none of nan options seemed correct arsenic I was expecting it to beryllium 18 – (6 × 2).”

Some group rushed to nan comments conception to effort and activity retired nan answer, but astir agreed location was an rumor pinch nan options provided.

“I deliberation it’s much apt a typo aliases misprint. If they swapped nan subtraction and multiplication motion and moved nan parentheses connected reply prime C, then: (18 x 2) – 6 could go 18 – (2 x 6),” 1 said.

“You’re correct, nan coach is wrong. If you simplify A, you get 1.5, which doesn’t make immoderate consciousness successful nan discourse of nan problem,” mused another.

While 1 simply said, “Seems that A is incorrect to me, too.”

Some tried to make it work, but struggled.

“Really twisting my encephalon present to make consciousness of A being correct, but present goes: if you disagreement 18 bottles by 2, you get 9 bottles successful 2 abstracted piles. Now, springiness 1 vessel from each heap to each 6 friends. The consequence would beryllium 3 bottles near successful 2 abstracted piles, aliases 6 leftover bottles total. Gymnastics,” declared one.

“A, if they are expected to usage Euclidean divisions (18/2 = she has 9 batches of 2, 9/6 => 1 and remainder is 3),” tried another.

While 1 described it arsenic “bad logic”, but gave it a stab anyway.

“This is nan only measurement I tin get immoderate of nan reply choices (and it is A) – I’m not saying it’s correct, only wanted to explicate their (wrong) logic:

“She’s splitting nan 18 bottles into sets of 2; that’s 18 / 2. Then, she’s splitting those sets of 2 among her 6 friends.

“That’s why you disagreement by 6 next. That leaves you pinch A. But arsenic everyone present has said, you and your boy are correct. The worksheet is wrong.”

Eventually, nan kid decided to expose nan rumor pinch nan question, writing: “None, 18 – (6 x 2).”

The begetter later returned to update everyone, stating, “The worksheet is so wrong.”

“I did talk pinch nan teacher, and they went complete it successful people together. The coach mentioned nary of nan answers were correct and what my boy came up pinch was correct,” he shared.