Lexie says she’s ever wanted to beryllium “financially dependent” connected her hubby – a stance that has ignited fierce debate.
Lexie, 26, is simply a mother of 2 who ran her ain hairdressing business for 7 years earlier having 2 children and deciding not to return to activity full-time.
“I’ve ever known I wanted to beryllium financially limited connected my husband, and I’ve ne'er had an rumor pinch it,” she said.
Lexie explained that her extremity has ever been to go a stay-at-home mom and wife.
“When I met my husband, we were conscionable friends; I told him each my plans. I wanted to get joined really young and person kids, and I didn’t want to spell backmost to activity aft having kids,” she said.
The young mom said she fell successful emotion pinch her hubby truthful quickly because he wanted a “similar dynamic,” therefore, money has ever been an unfastened conversation.
But erstwhile Lexie publically shared her feelings connected being “financially dependent,” galore recovered her honesty astir money and activity refreshing.
“Love this,” 1 praised.
“So bully you guys were upfront truthful early on,” different noted.
“I deliberation this is really awesome and should beryllium normalized,” 1 noted.
“It has been for illustration this generations connected some sides of my family. So it is each I’ve ever known, and I don’t want thing else,” personification other shared.
However, among nan affirmative comments were group who expressed interest that Lexie was financially overreliant connected her hubby and that she’d extremity up pinch nary superannuation.
“I cannot,” 1 remarked.
Another argued, “men particularly emotion to alteration their minds,” implying Lexie mightiness not beryllium making nan champion financial decision.
‘I don’t disagree pinch this lifestyle, but it’s really becoming a privilege to beryllium capable to do this now owed to nan costs of living,” different said.
“If you’re going to do this, you request to person a pre-nup signed that will guarantee you’re looked aft if nan matrimony ends, he decides to leave, cheat, etc.
“If you don’t person that, nary magnitude of financial consciousness tin prevention you if it ends and you person nary money of your own. Please look retired for yourselves, ladies,” 1 warned.
Speaking to news.com.au, Lexie said she is disappointment that group presume she’s someway not financially savvy solely because she’s not nan 1 making money.
“Some group deliberation there’s an ‘issue’ pinch what I’ve chosen to do aliases that it must not beryllium a prime aliases it isn’t nan correct prime aliases it isn’t a smart one,” she said.
“Just because I’m financially limited connected my hubby doesn’t mean I’m not financially unaware.”
“My hubby and I person complete transparency. Just because I’m not earning nan income doesn’t mean I don’t get to person a 50/50 opportunity successful really we walk it.”
She besides said nary 1 should interest astir her superannuation balance.
“We’re still figuring it out; alternatively of making further superannuation contributions, we’re putting it onto our location indebtedness because nan liking rates are truthful high,” she said.
She explained nan constituent of nan video was to constituent retired that conscionable because she’s not nan breadwinner, that doesn’t mean she doesn’t person adjacent financial power.
The 26-year-old stressed nan value of being “financially aware” and said that she has afloat entree to each their money.
Despite nan interest from Aussies, nan couple’s prime to unrecorded connected 1 income surely isn’t unusual.
Millions of Australians are financially limited connected their partner, according to caller investigation by financial comparison website Finder.
Almost 1 successful 4 women picture themselves arsenic financially dependent, and Finder’s investigation recovered that 22 percent of millennials presently trust connected their companions for money.
When she fell pregnant, nan mates soon started surviving disconnected her husband’s income to guarantee they could spend to support it up.
“We had been practicing surviving connected 1 income a fewer months earlier my boy was calved successful preparation,” she said.
“We reduced our surviving expenses and made immoderate sacrifices truthful I had choices erstwhile it came to returning to work.”
She did spell backmost to activity aft her first, but aft her second, nan daycare costs put nan mates off, and they decided to support surviving disconnected her husband’s wage, which is complete $100,000.
Living connected 1 income hasn’t been excessively overmuch of a struggle for nan 26-year-old, she insists.
“I’ve ever lived a minimalist style, and we’ve ever lived successful our means. We person ne'er had Afterpay aliases car loans.
“Our owe was nan smallest we could get to get a house,” she said.
The couple’s owe is simply a manageable $500,000, and they intentionally bought beneath what they could spend to borrow.
Still, nan mates changed immoderate habits to accommodate their income.
“We made changes, we changed our insurance, our telephone plans, and we don’t person galore streaming services,” she said.
“We don’t bargain takeaway, we don’t person gym memberships, and we trim retired those other items. We focused solely connected surviving pinch 1 income without stress, but there’s ever stress.”
The 26-year-old yet based on that staying astatine location has allowed her hubby to attraction connected his profession and perchance gain much money.
“Being stay-at-home genitor and taking connected those responsibilities does mean my hubby tin thrive successful his career,” she said.
Sadly, she feels there’s a stigma astir stay-at-home moms because women get “pitted against each other” wherever either prime is valid.